About This Project

This study explores the effectiveness of science fiction authors as funders in the specific realms of conservation and conservation technology. By comparing their funding decisions and impacts with those of traditional science funders, the project aims to uncover the potential of diverse, creative perspectives in addressing critical ecological challenges.

Ask the Scientists

What is the context of this research?

This study explores if science fiction authors, known for creative foresight, can effectively fund conservation and technology projects. It compares their funding decisions and impacts against those of traditional science funders. The rationale is that authors' imaginative perspectives could lead to innovative approaches in addressing ecological challenges. The study seeks to understand how diverse, non-academic backgrounds influence funding choices and outcomes in vital areas of conservation, potentially offering new insights into interdisciplinary collaboration and funding models in environmental science.

What is the significance of this project?

If the study reveals that science fiction authors are effective funders in conservation, it could revolutionize how we approach environmental challenges. Their unique, creative insights might identify groundbreaking projects, leading to innovative solutions for ecological issues. This could encourage a broader inclusion of diverse perspectives in scientific funding, going beyond conventional academic backgrounds. It might also inspire novel interdisciplinary collaborations, enhancing the potential for significant breakthroughs in conservation and technology. Essentially, this study could pave the way for more imaginative, effective strategies in environmental stewardship and sustainability.

What are the goals of the project?

1. To assess how science fiction authors approach funding decisions in the context of conservation and conservation technology projects, examining their selection criteria and priorities.
2. To compare the outcomes of projects funded by science fiction authors with those funded by traditional science funders, in terms of innovation, success, and impact.
3. To explore the potential of leveraging diverse, non-traditional backgrounds in enhancing the quality and scope of funded conservation projects.
4. To contribute new insights into interdisciplinary approaches in environmental science funding and to potentially influence future funding models by incorporating creative and varied perspectives.