Mapping Prejudice Towards African Americans

University of Wyoming
Psychology
DOI: 10.18258/1952
$1,050
Raised
104%
Funded on 10/24/14
Successfully Funded
  • $1,050
    pledged
  • 104%
    funded
  • Funded
    on 10/24/14

About This Project

How similar are you to your neighbors? Do you watch similar TV shows? Have similar prejudices? Research suggests we are very similar to those we live and work near. This means people with similar types of prejudices may cluster together and discriminate in similar ways. Our research will examine the geographic distribution of four distinct types of prejudice against African Americans.

Ask the Scientists

Join The Discussion

What is the context of this research?

Overt expressions of racial prejudice and discrimination against African Americans seem to have decreased since the 1960s, due in large part to the Civil Rights Movement. However, research has shown that racism has not necessarily declined. Instead, its presentation and expression have merely changed.

Our study accounts for this by measuring prejudice at both the implicit (or unconscious) and explicit (or conscious) level. This allows us to capture four distinct types of prejudice.

We will map the distribution of these four types of prejudice in the United States, becoming the first researchers to do so. This will add to a line of research in personality psychology which has found that similarly minded people tend to cluster themselves geographically.

What is the significance of this project?

Our research focuses on how individuals who exhibit prejudice against African Americans are distributed within the United States. Our study will be able to classify individuals, and thereby their communities, as belonging to one of four distinct categories:

  • Modern Racists - Report prejudicial beliefs and also hold unconscious racial biases
  • Aversive Racists - Report non-prejudiced beliefs and values, yet show evidence of unconscious racial bias
  • Principled Conservatives - Report prejudicial beliefs, yet show no evidence of unconscious racial bias
  • Truly Low Prejudice - Report non-prejudiced beliefs and show no evidence of unconscious racial bias
Mapping the distribution of racial prejudice will allow for the examination of how location affects the manner and frequency of prejudicial behavior.

What are the goals of the project?

Our research team will use the data collected from individuals in the United States to answer the following questions:

Short-term Goals:
Does racism differ in its presentation across different areas of the country?

Do people tend to live near others with similar types of prejudice?

Long-term Goals:

Do clusters of prejudice types predict real-world discriminatory behavior within their community, such as:

  1. Rates of minority criminal convictions
  2. Rates of false imprisonment of minorities
  3. Punishment for criminally convicted minorities
  4. Support for social welfare policies
  5. Voting patterns in local, state, and national elections



Budget

Please wait...

We have set a primary goal of $1,001 to begin data collection on this study. This goal takes into account the following budgetary items:

  1. 2,325 participants compensated at $0.36 each ($837)
  2. 10% commission to Amazon ($84)
  3. 8% service fee to Experiment ($80)

That's it. All we are asking for is enough to pay our participants and our service providers. We will recruit individuals from all 50 U.S. states using Amazon's Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing platform. Each participant will be paid $0.36 for completing a combination of self-report surveys and reaction-time tasks. This may not seem like a lot of money. However, our past experiences with this platform have led us to believe that it will be perceived as a fair wage within the Mturk community. In addition, Mturk participants are often guided by their interest in research, rather than monetary gain.



Meet the Team

Scott Freng
Scott Freng
Elizabeth Ferguson
Elizabeth Ferguson
Kimberly Schweitzer
Kimberly Schweitzer
Victoria Estrada-Reynolds
Victoria Estrada-Reynolds
Doctoral Candidate

Affiliates

University of Wyoming
View Profile

Team Bio

University of Wyoming's Psychology and Law Laboratory

Scott Freng
Ph.D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2001
M.A., U. of South Dakota, 1998
B.S., Black Hills State University, Spearfish, 1995

Kimberly Schweitzer
M.S., University of Wyoming, 2013
B.S., University of North Dakota, 2010

Victoria Estrada

M.A., University of Texas-El Paso, 2012
B.A., University of Texas-El Paso, 2009

Elizabeth Ferguson
M.S., University of Wyoming, 2014
B.S., Old Dominion University, 2012

Elizabeth Ferguson

The Spatial Psychology research team at the University of Wyoming was formed to pursue research questions related to how psychological constructs are represented in and affected by their geographic space. Members include graduate students and faculty members in Psychology and Law and Social Psychology sub-disciplines.

Lab Notes

Nothing posted yet.

Additional Information

Relevant Publications by Project Members

Estrada, Victoria Christine
, Hosch, Harmon M, Ferguson, Elizabeth, & Hall, Jeremiah (2013, March). The Effects of Defendant and Juror Language Use on Sentencing Recommendations. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Psychology-Law Society. Portland, OR.

Freng, Scott & Kehn, Andre (2012): Determining True and False Witnessed Events: Can an Eyewitness-Implicit Association Test Distinguish Between the Seen and Unseen, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, DOI:10.1080/13218719.2012.735885

Freng, Scott & Willis-Esqueda, Cynthia (2011): A Question of Honor: Chief Wahoo and American Indian Stereotype Activation Among a University Based Sample, The Journal of Social Psychology, 151:5, 577-591

Johns, Michael, Cullum, Jerry, Smith, Tonya, & Freng, Scott (2008): Internal motivation to respond without prejudice and automatic egalitarian goal activation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1514-1519

Schweitzer, Kimberly, Varley, S., Kehn, A., & Nunez, N. (May 25, 2012). Limits to the Cross-Race Effect: Are Cross-Race Composites Easier to Identify in a Line-Up? Poster presented at the annual Association for Psychological Science conference. Chicago, IL.

Project Backers

  • 25Backers
  • 104%Funded
  • $1,050Total Donations
  • $42.00Average Donation
Please wait...